Spreadsheet

    Demographics of the new state Senate districts

    The Cali­for­nia Cit­izens Re­dis­trict­ing Com­mis­sion tent­at­ively ap­proved new state polit­ic­al maps on Ju­ly 29. A fi­nal vote is sched­uled Au­gust 15 after a two-week pub­lic re­view peri­od. Here is a look at the break­down of party re­gis­tra­tion and race/eth­ni­city for the newly drawn dis­tricts. Click on a dis­trict’s num­ber or name code to see a map of that dis­trict. Read more: Pan­el’s fi­nal re­dis­trict­ing maps drawn.

    Published:
    July 29, 2011
       Download: CSV | XLS | JSON
    Search:
    1/1 per page
    District Name code Population Democrat Republican Other party White Black Asian Latino Other
    1 MTCAP 935,336 30.2% 45.7% 24.1% 79.4% 1.5% 3.9% 10.7% 4.5%
    2 NORCO 928,077 49.8% 23.3% 26.9% 69.9% 1.7% 3.6% 19.5% 5.2%
    3 WINE 928,167 49.2% 25.6% 25.2% 51.5% 7.4% 11.5% 25.0% 4.6%
    4 YUBA 937,962 34.7% 41.9% 23.4% 65.9% 3.1% 6.4% 19.7% 4.9%
    5 SNJOA 939,163 42.8% 38.4% 18.8% 40.2% 6.0% 12.1% 37.8% 3.9%
    6 SAC 936,301 48.8% 28.4% 22.8% 38.7% 12.1% 19.0% 24.8% 5.5%
    7 RAMON 924,708 44.4% 31.1% 24.5% 54.7% 5.7% 14.4% 20.9% 4.3%
    8 FTHLL 929,712 35.1% 44.6% 20.3% 56.0% 3.7% 8.2% 28.2% 3.9%
    9 RCHMD 940,601 64.2% 9.7% 26.0% 31.8% 19.1% 20.6% 23.9% 4.6%
    10 FREOAK 923,707 50.7% 18.9% 30.4% 25.4% 5.6% 40.4% 24.3% 4.3%
    11 SF 930,853 56.2% 9.9% 33.9% 38.3% 5.4% 36.2% 16.3% 3.7%
    12 MRCED 933,222 49.5% 32.1% 18.4% 25.7% 2.8% 4.9% 64.5% 2.2%
    13 SNMAT 927,480 49.8% 21.8% 28.4% 47.6% 2.3% 24.3% 21.8% 4.0%
    14 KINGS 935,376 48.0% 33.9% 18.1% 17.9% 4.5% 4.5% 71.2% 1.9%
    15 SJOSE 928,584 45.5% 24.6% 29.9% 34.3% 2.5% 30.0% 30.0% 3.2%
    16 TULKE 922,123 30.6% 47.9% 21.6% 52.0% 4.6% 4.1% 35.7% 3.5%
    17 WMONT 931,341 45.1% 29.2% 25.8% 56.5% 2.0% 7.2% 30.9% 3.4%
    18 LASFE 928,725 54.3% 19.2% 26.5% 29.1% 3.9% 8.3% 56.5% 2.2%
    19 SBWVE 928,850 44.1% 31.8% 24.1% 42.2% 1.8% 5.2% 48.3% 2.6%
    20 POMSB 935,935 48.8% 29.3% 21.9% 15.7% 8.1% 5.9% 68.4% 1.8%
    21 LAAVV 930,282 36.4% 40.6% 23.0% 40.0% 11.1% 5.0% 40.7% 3.2%
    22 LACVN 929,298 46.9% 24.9% 28.3% 12.2% 1.5% 31.6% 53.4% 1.4%
    23 SBBAN 933,807 34.3% 43.9% 21.8% 45.5% 7.2% 6.0% 38.0% 3.3%
    24 LAELA 933,510 59.7% 13.2% 27.0% 12.0% 3.0% 16.8% 66.7% 1.5%
    25 LASGF 926,935 41.6% 33.2% 25.2% 52.2% 4.8% 13.7% 26.0% 3.3%
    26 LAPVB 927,757 47.2% 25.1% 27.7% 64.9% 3.5% 13.9% 13.6% 4.1%
    27 EVENT 935,656 40.7% 34.9% 24.4% 58.2% 2.7% 11.0% 24.8% 3.3%
    28 CCHTM 930,072 34.2% 44.5% 21.3% 47.6% 3.5% 5.2% 40.8% 2.8%
    29 CHFUL 925,494 34.3% 40.2% 25.5% 31.7% 2.5% 26.6% 36.6% 2.5%
    30 LAVSQ 922,496 68.5% 9.8% 21.7% 14.1% 27.5% 5.9% 50.0% 2.5%
    31 RIVMV 940,612 39.6% 37.9% 22.6% 28.7% 8.7% 7.5% 52.4% 2.7%
    32 LAPRW 933,406 48.9% 28.4% 22.8% 19.2% 3.5% 14.6% 60.9% 1.8%
    33 LALBS 926,972 58.0% 18.1% 23.9% 13.0% 8.6% 6.7% 70.0% 1.8%
    34 WSTSA 927,893 38.3% 38.0% 23.6% 29.0% 1.2% 20.9% 46.8% 2.1%
    35 LAWBC 934,615 61.1% 16.7% 22.2% 11.4% 21.0% 12.3% 53.0% 2.3%
    36 SANOC 938,083 27.8% 45.8% 26.4% 63.4% 2.1% 7.1% 23.8% 3.6%
    37 IRVTST 937,986 29.0% 44.6% 26.4% 56.0% 1.3% 17.6% 21.7% 3.4%
    38 NESAN 929,760 28.7% 45.4% 25.9% 58.5% 3.2% 7.0% 27.2% 4.0%
    39 CSAND 928,044 38.3% 31.5% 30.2% 59.2% 4.6% 15.2% 16.9% 4.2%
    40 ISAND 935,055 48.0% 26.1% 25.9% 16.4% 6.9% 11.7% 62.3% 2.7%

    Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; California Citizens Redistricting Commission; Statewide Database, University of California Berkeley Law, Center for Research

    Credits: Thomas Suh Lauder, Sandra Poindexter, Doug Smith, Allan Vestal and Ben Welsh

    Advertisement

    Readers: What’s your take? Share it here.